ADVERTISEMENT
CURRENT ISSUE
MAY 2013
KINDLE EDITION



SEARCH JOURNAL ARCHIVES


SEARCH PUBMED


MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSIONS


SUBSCRIBE TO SLEEP

CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION


ADVERTISE WITH US


ABOUT SLEEP

ABSTRACT SUPPLEMENTS


ACCEPTED PAPERS
Bookmark and Share         RSS Feed

VOLUME 35, ISSUE 07

HOMEOSTATIC AND CIRCADIAN PROCESSES DURING SLEEP RESTRICTION
The Relative Contributions of the Homeostatic and Circadian Processes to Sleep Regulation under Conditions of Severe Sleep Restriction

http://dx.doi.org/10.5665/sleep.1956

Gemma M. Paech, BSc(Hons)1; Sally A. Ferguson, PhD1,3; Charli Sargent, PhD1,3; David J. Kennaway, PhD2; Gregory D. Roach, PhD1,3

1Centre for Sleep Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 2Robinson Institute, Research Centre for Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 3Appelton Institute, CQUniversity, Wayville, South Australia, Australia



  Expand  Table of Contents    
Text size:  

Study Objectives:

To investigate the relative contributions of the homeostatic and circadian processes on sleep regulation under conditions of severe sleep restriction.

Design:

The 13-day laboratory based study consisted of 3 × 24-h baseline days (8 h sleep opportunity, 16 h wake) followed by 7 × 28-h forced desynchrony days (4.7 h sleep opportunity, 23.3 h wake).

Setting:

The study was conducted in a time isolation unit at the Centre for Sleep Research, University of South Australia.

Participants:

Fourteen healthy, nonsmoking males, aged 21.8 ± 3.8 (mean ± SD) years participated in the study.

Interventions:

N/A

Measurements:

Sleep was measured using standard polysomnography. Core body temperature (CBT) was recorded continuously using a rectal thermistor. Each epoch of sleep was assigned a circadian phase based on the CBT data (6 × 60-degree bins) and an elapsed time into sleep episode (2 × 140-min intervals).

Results:

The percentage of SWS decreased with elapsed time into the sleep episode. However, no change in the percentage of REM sleep was observed with sleep progression. Whilst there was a circadian modulation of REM sleep, the amplitude of the circadian variation was smaller than expected. Sleep efficiency remained high throughout the sleep episode and across all circadian phases.

Conclusions:

Previous forced desynchrony studies have demonstrated a strong circadian influence on sleep, in the absence of sleep restriction. The current study suggests that in the presence of high homeostatic pressure, the circadian modulation of sleep, in particular sleep efficiency and to a lesser extent, REM sleep, are reduced.

Citation:

Paech GM; Ferguson SA; Sargent C; Kennaway DJ; Roach GD. The relative contributions of the homeostatic and circadian processes to sleep regulation under conditions of severe sleep restriction. SLEEP 2012;35(7):941-948.

Expand  Table of Contents
ADVERTISEMENT
Classifieds View SLEEP 2011 Poster Presentations Online